Music Can Do For Universal Language?
Until now, most people think music is a universal language. That is, to speak the language of music to listen to anyone who would be easy to accept. Whether it's Dimitri of Russia, Kohl of Germany, John of England, Watanabe from Japan or Jet Lee from China. (he said) talk with the music more acceptable than in other languages.
One day, having in my musings to prove it. Universal language of music is it true? Is it true that everyone can receive the music in a communication? Is not the language used in a communication? After I studied music (piano) is about two and a half years of intensive in Yogya with a faculty member at the Art Institute of Indonesia and Bandung in a course leading music, yet also a knot in my mind that music is a universal language as it is often touted by most scholars music and musicians.
Because until this moment I do not mind also that the knot is the universal language of music then I dare say that music is not a universal language.
Why?
First, the music itself is actually not a language but sound, voice, or sound. Well that sounds can be used in a communication to be a language. But it's not automatic that because music is the language of music is a special form of musical sounds in a language called tone or tone said the Englishman. While the sounds used in communication or language, no tone like your music with the theories of harmony that it can be concluded that music and language is only a neighboring house with no blood linkage as a brother. That is, music and language do not have anything to do. Music is not the language and the language is not music. So, how music can be a language? Universal again!
Second, even if the music remains the universal language, why the UN (United Nation Bangsa-bangsa/Union) do not use it as a primary language in its sessions? Is not this easy communication with all delegates or delegates who come from countries with different languages?
Third, if the music is also forced to become a language, do not imagine what a mess this life. How do I have to say 'this mountain' with the language of music? What if it was not understood as 'this mountain' but 'fat goats'? Of those who interpret 'this goat fat' can not be blamed because the music does not speak so it will not be able to explain things clearly.
Fourth, if the music is a universal language, why the music is also divided in a grid jazz, dangdut, rock, pop, keroncong, classic, traditional Sundanese, Africa, Ireland, Ambon, Bali, and billions and billions of other boxes? Are not these boxes also shows that music is not something that is universal? How could the Twilight Orchestra will play music in the midst of the tribes of Irian Jaya on the grounds of music is a universal language? Unless Mas emang Addie MS want to make people groggy Irian Jaya.
Until now, most people think music is a universal language. That is, to speak the language of music to listen to anyone who would be easy to accept. Whether it's Dimitri of Russia, Kohl of Germany, John of England, Watanabe from Japan or Jet Lee from China. (he said) talk with the music more acceptable than in other languages.
One day, having in my musings to prove it. Universal language of music is it true? Is it true that everyone can receive the music in a communication? Is not the language used in a communication? After I studied music (piano) is about two and a half years of intensive in Yogya with a faculty member at the Art Institute of Indonesia and Bandung in a course leading music, yet also a knot in my mind that music is a universal language as it is often touted by most scholars music and musicians.
Because until this moment I do not mind also that the knot is the universal language of music then I dare say that music is not a universal language.
Why?
First, the music itself is actually not a language but sound, voice, or sound. Well that sounds can be used in a communication to be a language. But it's not automatic that because music is the language of music is a special form of musical sounds in a language called tone or tone said the Englishman. While the sounds used in communication or language, no tone like your music with the theories of harmony that it can be concluded that music and language is only a neighboring house with no blood linkage as a brother. That is, music and language do not have anything to do. Music is not the language and the language is not music. So, how music can be a language? Universal again!
Second, even if the music remains the universal language, why the UN (United Nation Bangsa-bangsa/Union) do not use it as a primary language in its sessions? Is not this easy communication with all delegates or delegates who come from countries with different languages?
Third, if the music is also forced to become a language, do not imagine what a mess this life. How do I have to say 'this mountain' with the language of music? What if it was not understood as 'this mountain' but 'fat goats'? Of those who interpret 'this goat fat' can not be blamed because the music does not speak so it will not be able to explain things clearly.
Fourth, if the music is a universal language, why the music is also divided in a grid jazz, dangdut, rock, pop, keroncong, classic, traditional Sundanese, Africa, Ireland, Ambon, Bali, and billions and billions of other boxes? Are not these boxes also shows that music is not something that is universal? How could the Twilight Orchestra will play music in the midst of the tribes of Irian Jaya on the grounds of music is a universal language? Unless Mas emang Addie MS want to make people groggy Irian Jaya.
0 comments:
Post a Comment